4.7 Article

Adaptive Neural Network Tracking Control for Robotic Manipulators With Dead Zone

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2869375

Keywords

Artificial neural networks; Manipulators; Backstepping; Adaptive control; Backstepping control; dead-zone input; neural network (NN) control; robotic manipulators

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673072, 61622302, U1611262, 61803099, 61425009]
  2. Innovative Research Team Program of Guangdong Province Science Foundation [2018B030312006]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2017A030306014]
  4. Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2016KTSCX030]
  5. Department of Education of Liaoning Province [LZ2017001]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017FZA5010]
  7. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2017B010116006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the adaptive neural network (NN) tracking control problem is addressed for robot manipulators subject to dead-zone input. The control objective is to design an adaptive NN controller to guarantee the stability of the systems and obtain good performance. Different from the existing results, which used NN to approximate the nonlinearities directly, NNs are employed to identify the originally designed virtual control signals with unknown nonlinear items in this paper. Moreover, a sequence of virtual control signals and real controller are designed. The adaptive backstepping control method and Lyapunov stability theory are used to prove the proposed controller can ensure all the signals in the systems are semiglobally uniformly ultimately bounded, and the output of the systems can track the reference signal closely. Finally, the proposed adaptive control strategy is applied to the Puma 560 robot manipulator to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available