4.3 Article

Cas9-Mediated Gene-Editing in the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles stephensi by ReMOT Control

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 1353-1360

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401133

Keywords

CRISPR; Cas9; ovary translocation; reverse genetics

Funding

  1. NSF/BIO [1645331]
  2. NIH/NIAID [R21AI111175, R01AI128201, R21AI138074, R21AI129507, R01AI29746]
  3. USDA/NIFA [2014-10320, 2017-67012-26101]
  4. USDA Hatch funds [1010032, PEN04608]
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco Settlement Funds
  6. Wolfson Foundation
  7. Royal Society fellowship [RSWF\R1\180013]
  8. John S. Dunn Foundation Collaborative Research Award
  9. Fulbright Fellowship
  10. Colciencias

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Innovative tools are essential for advancing malaria control and depend on an understanding of molecular mechanisms governing transmission of malaria parasites by Anopheles mosquitoes. CRISPR/Cas9-based gene disruption is a powerful method to uncover underlying biology of vector-pathogen interactions and can itself form the basis of mosquito control strategies. However, embryo injection methods used to genetically manipulate mosquitoes (especially Anopheles) are difficult and inefficient, particularly for non-specialist laboratories. Here, we adapted the ReMOT Control (Receptor-mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo) technique to deliver Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex to adult mosquito ovaries, generating targeted and heritable mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi without injecting embryos. In Anopheles, ReMOT Control gene editing was as efficient as standard embryo injections. The application of ReMOT Control to Anopheles opens the power of CRISPR/Cas9 methods to malaria laboratories that lack the equipment or expertise to perform embryo injections and establishes the flexibility of ReMOT Control for diverse mosquito species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available