A Comparative Study to Evaluate Accuracy on Canopy Height and Density Using UAV, ALS, and Fieldwork

Accurate measurement of the tree height and canopy cover density is important for forest biomass and management. Recently, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) images have been used to estimate the tree height and canopy cover density for a forest stands. More so, UAV systems with autopilot functions, affordable Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) have created new possibilities, aided by available photogrammetric programs. In this study, we investigated the possibility of data collection methods using an Aerial LIDAR Scanner (ALS) and an UAV together with a fieldworks to evaluate accurate the tree standard metrics in Singyeri, Gyeongjusi, and Gyeongsangbukdo province. The derived metrics via statistical analyses of the ALS and UAV data and validated by field measurements were compared to a published forest type map (scale 1:5000) by the Korea Forest Service; geared towards improving the forest attributes. We collected data and analyzed and compared them with existent the forest type map produced from an aerial photographs and a digital stereo plotter. The ALS data of around 19.5 points center dot m(-2) were collected by an airplane, then processed and classified using the LAStools; while about 362 images of the UAV were processed via Structure from Motion algorithm in the Agisoft Metashape Pro. Thus, we calculated the metrics using the point clouds of both an ALS and an UAV, and then verified their similarity. The fieldwork was manually done on 110 sampled trees. Calculated heights of the UAV were 3.8 similar to 5.8 m greater than those for the ALS; and when correlated with the fieldwork, the UAV data overestimated, while the maximum height of the ALS data was more accurate. For the canopy cover, the ALS computed canopy cover was 10%similar to 30% less than that of the UAV. However, the canopy cover above 2 m by an UAV was the best measurement for a forest canopy. Therefore, these results assert that the examined techniques are robust and can significantly complement methods of the conventional data acquisition for the forest type map.