4.5 Review

Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 368, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6890

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cochrane Methods Innovation Fund
  2. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12017-13, MC_UU_12017-15]
  3. Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office [SPHSU13, SPHSU15]
  4. NHS Research Scotland senior clinical fellowship [SCAF/15/02]
  5. NHMRC career development fellowship [1143429]
  6. NHMRC Cochrane Collaboration Funding Program (2017-2010)
  7. MRC [MC_UU_00022/2, MC_UU_12017/15, MC_UU_12017/13] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available