4.5 Article

Investigation of flexural performance of concrete reinforced with indented and fibrillated macro polypropylene fibers based on numerical and experimental comparison

Journal

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 250-263

Publisher

ERNST & SOHN
DOI: 10.1002/suco.201900374

Keywords

energy absorption capacity; fiber reinforced concrete (FRC); fibrillated fibers; finite element model (FEM); flexural performance; indented fibers; macro fibers; polypropylene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fiber/matrix interface in fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) can be enhanced by adjusting the geometry of the fiber surface, leading to improvements in flexural performance and energy absorption capacity. The finite element model used was successful in predicting the mechanical performance of FRC, demonstrating its significance for the design and optimization of concrete structures.
The fiber/matrix interface in fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) enhances due to the geometry of fiber surface. This work benefits from freedom of fiber engineering due to the availability of fiber production facilities. Non-indented, indented, flat tape, and fibrillated macro polypropylene fibers were produced. The effect of fiber surface indentation and fibrillation on FRCs flexural performance was investigated. Concrete flexural strength due to the effect of fiber young modulus was found to increases by 94 and 61%, when indented and fibrillated fibers are used, respectively. The energy absorption capacity of samples containing indented and fibrillated fibers due to the effect of surface fibrillation were found to be 5.5 and 12.5 times more than that of control concrete, respectively. The mechanical performance of FRCs was modeled using finite element model. The model generated and experimental results showed acceptable compatibility. Thus, the model can be concluded to be a successful tool for prediction of FRCs flexural performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available