4.5 Article

Extremely preterm birth affects boys more and socio-economic and neonatal variables pose sex-specific risks

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 514-521

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.12937

Keywords

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development third edition; Developmental outcome; Extremely preterm; Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden Study; Sex differences

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2006-3855, 2009-4250]
  2. Crafoord Foundation
  3. Nils W Svenningsens Stiftelse for Prematurforskning
  4. Queen Silvia's Jubilee Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimThe early identification of at-risk extremely preterm (EPT) children could improve long-term outcomes. This study sought to investigate sex differences in developmental outcomes and to identify sex-specific predictors at two and a half years of age. MethodsWe assessed 217 boys and 181 girls born before 27-week gestation using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III), as a part of the Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden Study. Sex-specific differences were calculated. Socio-economic, birth and neonatal factors were calculated separately for boys and girls using regression models. ResultsGirls scored significantly higher than boys on all Bayley-III indices. In both sexes, brain injury, long-term ventilator treatment and foreign-born mothers predicted lower scores. Receiving breast milk by hospital discharge predicted higher scores. Severe retinopathy of prematurity was the strongest predictor of cognitive and language deficits in boys. High parental education predicted higher cognitive and language scores in girls, whereas severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest predictor of motor deficits. ConclusionExtreme prematurity seems to affect boys more than girls. Socio-economic and neonatal factors confer similar risks or protections on both sexes, but some variables pose sex-specific risks. An awareness of risk factors may provide the basis for treatment and follow-up guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available