4.7 Article

Synergistic Catalysis of Co(OH)2/CuO for the Degradation of Organic Pollutant Under Visible Light Irradiation

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59053-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University Scientific Research Project of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region [XJEDU2017I001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21861035]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Project of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region [2017E01005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exploration of advanced water treatment technologies e.g. heterogeneous photocatalysis is the most promising way to address organic pollution issues. Semiconductors based bimetallic photocatalysis with wide bandgap, have displayed splendid degradation performance in the UV light region, but their extension to the visible light/near infra-red region is still a matter of great concern. CuO, Co(OH)(2), CoO and Co(OH)(2)/CuO nanocomposites were synthesized via simple co-precipitation method and further practiced for Rhodamine B (RhB) decomposition by introducing per-sulfate (PS) as a sacrificial agent. Results revealed that Co(OH)(2)/CuO catalyst had shown robust catalytic activity for RhB photodegradation (degradation time 8min, k=0.864min(-1)) under light illumination, significantly less (12-60 times) than the other reported bimetallic catalysts. Catalyst also have verified excellent performance for a broader pH range (5-9) with excellent stability. Main reactive species responsible for the photocatalytic reaction were sulfate (SO4 center dot-) and superoxide (O-2(center dot)) radicals, duly verified by ESR and by using radical scavengers. With outstanding recycling abilities, this is probably the fewer successful attempt for RhB decolorization and can be highly favorable for effluent treatment by using the synergic effect of absorption and photodegradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available