4.7 Article

Intra-specific Niche Partitioning in Antarctic Fur Seals, Arctocephalus gazella

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59992-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Capability Fund
  2. NERC Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry Facility
  3. NERC Great Western Four+ Doctoral Training Partnership (GW4+ DTP) [NE/L002434/1]
  4. NERC [bas0100035] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Competition for resources within a population can lead to niche partitioning between sexes, throughout ontogeny and among individuals, allowing con-specifics to co-exist. We aimed to quantify such partitioning in Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, breeding at South Georgia, which hosts similar to 95% of the world's population. Whiskers were collected from 20 adult males and 20 adult females and stable isotope ratios were quantified every 5 mm along the length of each whisker. Nitrogen isotope ratios (delta N-15) were used as proxies for trophic position and carbon isotope ratios (delta C-13) indicated foraging habitat. Sexual segregation was evident: delta C-13 values were significantly lower in males than females, indicating males spent more time foraging south of the Polar Front in maritime Antarctica. In males delta C-13 values declined with age, suggesting males spent more time foraging south throughout ontogeny. In females delta C-13 values revealed two main foraging strategies: 70% of females spent most time foraging south of the Polar Front and had similar delta N-15 values to males, while 30% of females spent most time foraging north of the Polar Front and had significantly higher delta N-15 values. This niche partitioning may relax competition and ultimately elevate population carrying capacity with implications for ecology, evolution and conservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available