4.7 Article

Transcriptome analysis in roots and leaves of wheat seedlings in response to low-phosphorus stress

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56451-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0200500]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission's Yangtze River Delta Science and Technology Joint Research Project [17295810062]
  3. Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences Outstanding Team Plan [2017(A-03)]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [16ZR1431100, 17ZR1431200]
  5. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission's Key Project in Social Development Field [17DZ1202301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low phosphorus availability is a major abiotic factor constraining wheat growth. The molecular mechanisms of the wheat whole genome under low-phosphorus stress are still unclear. To obtain information on gene expression in wheat seedlings under low-phosphorus stress, transcriptome sequencing was performed on roots and leaves. The results showed that 2,318 (1,646 upregulated and 672 downregulated) transcripts were differentially expressed in the leaves, and 2,018 (1,310 upregulated and 708 downregulated) were differentially expressed in the roots. Further analysis showed that these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mainly enriched in carbon fixation in photosynthetic organs and in carbon metabolism, photosynthesis, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism and plant-pathogen interaction in both leaves and roots. These pathways were mainly associated with environmental adaptation, energy metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism, suggesting that the metabolic processes were strengthened in wheat seedlings under low-phosphorus stress and that more energy and substances were produced to resist or adapt to this unfavourable environment. This research might provide potential directions and valuable resources to further study wheat under low-phosphorus stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available