4.7 Article

Sperm quality and quantity evolve through different selective processes in the Phasianidae

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55822-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [31772451]
  2. Science and Technology Youth Innovation Team of Sichuan Province [19CXTD0022]
  3. Key Cultivation Foundation of China West Normal University [17A006]
  4. Talent Project of China West Normal University [17YC335]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P3-170669]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sperm competition is often considered the primary selective force underlying the rapid and diversifying evolution of ejaculate traits.Yet, several recent studies have drawn attention to other forms of selection with the potential of exceeding the effects of sperm competition. Since ejaculates are complex, multivariate traits, it seems plausible that different ejaculate components vary in their responses to different selective pressures. Such information, however, is generally lacking as individual ejaculate traits tend to be studied in isolation. Here, we studied the macroevolutionary patterns of ejaculate volume, sperm number, sperm length and the proportion of viable normal sperm in response to varying levels of sperm competition, body size and the duration of female sperm storage in pheasants and allies (Phasianidae). Ejaculate volume, sperm number and sperm viability were all relatively higher in polygamous than in monogamous mating systems. However, whereas ejaculate volume additionally covaried with body size, sperm number instead increased with the female sperm-storage duration, in conjunction with a decrease in sperm length. Overall, our results revealed important details on how different forms of selection can jointly shape ejaculates as complex, composite traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available