4.5 Article

Anomalies and trends of high river flow under temperate climatic conditions in north-eastern Romania

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 552-565

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2020.124

Keywords

anomalies; Eastern Romania; high flow quantile perturbation method; magnitudes; partial trend method; trends

Funding

  1. Department of Geography and Research Department from the `Alexandru Ioan Cuza' University of Iasi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used methods such as the quantile perturbation method and the partial trend method to analyze the anomalies and trends of high flow in rivers in Eastern Romania. The results showed a decreasing trend in annual high flow and different variations in seasonal high flow in different seasons.
Regional water resource management plans include various scenarios related to the anomalies and trends of hydro-climatic parameters. Two methods are used for the identification of the anomalies and trends associated with high flow (annual and seasonal) of the rivers in Eastern Romania, namely the quantile perturbation method (QPM) and the partial trend method (PMT). These methods were selected due to the fact that they are suitable for data sets which do not rely on restrictive statistical assumption as common parametric and nonparametric trend tests do. For six of the nine stations analyzed, the decreasing trend in high extremes for annual high flow based on the PTM is the same as the annual trend obtained with the QPM. Using the PI index (associated with PTM) for the estimation of trend intensity, values between -2.280 and -9.015 m(3)/s were calculated for the decreasing trend of the annual high flow and between +1,633 m(3)/s (in autumn) and -9.940 m(3)/s (in summer) for the seasonal high flow. The results obtained on the anomalies and trends of high river flow may represent a starting point in the analysis of the evolution of water resources and their effective management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available