4.8 Article

Pollution exacerbates China's water scarcity and its regional inequality

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14532-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0503600]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20040401]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41421001, 41525004, 41771418]
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDY-SSW-DQC007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact on inadequate water quality on water scarcity is unclear. Here the authors quantify China's present-day water scarcity and show that inadequate water quality exacerbates China's water scarcity, which is unevenly distributed across the country. Inadequate water quality can mean that water is unsuitable for a variety of human uses, thus exacerbating freshwater scarcity. Previous large-scale water scarcity assessments mostly focused on the availability of sufficient freshwater quantity for providing supplies, but neglected the quality constraints on water usability. Here we report a comprehensive nationwide water scarcity assessment in China, which explicitly includes quality requirements for human water uses. We highlight the necessity of incorporating water scarcity assessment at multiple temporal and geographic scales. Our results show that inadequate water quality exacerbates China's water scarcity, which is unevenly distributed across the country. North China often suffers water scarcity throughout the year, whereas South China, despite sufficient quantities, experiences seasonal water scarcity due to inadequate quality. Over half of the population are affected by water scarcity, pointing to an urgent need for improving freshwater quantity and quality management to cope with water scarcity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available