4.8 Article

Alternative transcription cycle for bacterial RNA polymerase

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14208-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM081648, R35GM124732, R01GM044025, R01GM38660]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1610737, MRSEC DMR-1420382]
  4. Pew Biomedical Scholars Program
  5. Searle Scholars Program
  6. Sloan Research Fellowship
  7. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Fellowship
  8. Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellowship
  9. Smith Family Awards

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA polymerases (RNAPs) transcribe genes through a cycle of recruitment to promoter DNA, initiation, elongation, and termination. After termination, RNAP is thought to initiate the next round of transcription by detaching from DNA and rebinding a new promoter. Here we use single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to observe individual RNAP molecules after transcript release at a terminator. Following termination, RNAP almost always remains bound to DNA and sometimes exhibits one-dimensional sliding over thousands of basepairs. Unexpectedly, the DNA-bound RNAP often restarts transcription, usually in reverse direction, thus producing an antisense transcript. Furthermore, we report evidence of this secondary initiation in live cells, using genome-wide RNA sequencing. These findings reveal an alternative transcription cycle that allows RNAP to reinitiate without dissociating from DNA, which is likely to have important implications for gene regulation. In the canonical bacterial transcription, both nascent transcript and polymerase dissociate from template DNA. By employing multi-color single-molecule fluorescence imaging, here the authors show that RNA polymerases remain bound to DNA after the transcript release.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available