4.8 Article

Mutations in the HPV16 genome induced by APOBEC3 are associated with viral clearance

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14730-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]
  3. Institut National du Cancer (INCa), France [SHSESP 16-006]
  4. National Cancer Institute [CA78527]
  5. Einstein Cancer Research Center from the National Cancer Institute [P30CA013330]
  6. Gerstner Scholars Fellowship from the Gerstner Family Foundation at the American Museum of Natural History
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIACP010228] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HPV16 causes half of cervical cancers worldwide; for unknown reasons, most infections resolve within two years. Here, we analyze the viral genomes of 5,328 HPV16-positive case-control samples to investigate mutational signatures and the role of human APOBEC3-induced mutations in viral clearance and cervical carcinogenesis. We identify four de novo mutational signatures, one of which matches the COSMIC APOBEC-associated signature 2. The viral genomes of the precancer/cancer cases are less likely to contain within-host somatic HPV16 APOBEC3-induced mutations (Fisher's exact test, P = 6.2 x 10(-14)), and have a 30% lower nonsynonymous APOBEC3 mutation burden compared to controls. We replicate the low prevalence of HPV16 APOBEC3-induced mutations in 1,749 additional cases. APOBEC3 mutations also historically contribute to the evolution of HPV16 lineages. We demonstrate that cervical infections with a greater burden of somatic HPV16 APOBEC3induced mutations are more likely to be benign or subsequently clear, suggesting they may reduce persistence, and thus progression, within the host.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available