4.8 Article

Increase in global emissions of HFC-23 despite near-total expected reductions

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13899-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Upper Atmosphere Research Program [NNX16AC98G, NNX16AC96G, NNX16AC97G]
  2. NASA
  3. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS, UK) [1028/06/2015, 1537/06/2018]
  4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, USA) [RA-133-R15-CN-0008]
  5. Australian Bureau of Meteorology
  6. CSIRO
  7. Australian Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE)
  8. Refrigerant Reclaim Australia (RRA)
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I021365/1]
  10. NERC [NE/L013088/1, NE/K002236/1, NE/I021365/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, new controls are being implemented to reduce emissions of HFC-23 (CHF3), a by-product during the manufacture of HCFC-22 (CHClF2). Starting in 2015, China and India, who dominate global HCFC-22 production (75% in 2017), set out ambitious programs to reduce HFC-23 emissions. Here, we estimate that these measures should have seen global emissions drop by 87% between 2014 and 2017. Instead, atmospheric observations show that emissions have increased and in 2018 were higher than at any point in history (15.9 +/- 0.9 Gg yr(-1)). Given the magnitude of the discrepancy between expected and observation-inferred emissions, it is likely that the reported reductions have not fully materialized or there may be substantial unreported production of HCFC-22, resulting in unaccounted-for HFC-23 by-product emissions. The difference between reported and observation-inferred estimates suggests that an additional similar to 309 Tg CO2-equivalent emissions were added to the atmosphere between 2015 and 2017.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available