4.8 Article

Selective small molecule PARG inhibitor causes replication fork stalling and cancer cell death

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13508-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 CA200231, P01 CA092584]
  2. Robert A. Welch Chemistry Chair
  3. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
  4. University of Texas System Science and Technology Acquisition and Retention
  5. NIH [P41 GM103393, R35CA22043]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  7. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  8. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ACI-1134872]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(ADP-ribose)ylation (PARylation) by PAR polymerase 1 (PARP1) and PARylation removal by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) critically regulate DNA damage responses; yet, conflicting reports obscure PARG biology and its impact on cancer cell resistance to PARP1 inhibitors. Here, we found that PARG expression is upregulated in many cancers. We employed chemical library screening to identify and optimize methylxanthine derivatives as selective bioavailable PARG inhibitors. Multiple crystal structures reveal how substituent positions on the methylxanthine core dictate binding modes and inducible-complementarity with a PARG-specific tyrosine clasp and arginine switch, supporting inhibitor specificity and a competitive inhibition mechanism. Cell-based assays show selective PARG inhibition and PARP1 hyperPARylation. Moreover, our PARG inhibitor sensitizes cells to radiation-induced DNA damage, suppresses replication fork progression and impedes cancer cell survival. In PARP inhibitor-resistant A172 glioblastoma cells, our PARG inhibitor shows comparable killing to Nedaplatin, providing further proof-of-concept that selectively inhibiting PARG can impair cancer cell survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available