4.4 Article

The agreement between fasting glucose and markers of chronic glycaemic exposure in individuals with and without chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study

Journal

BMC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-1697-z

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Fructosamine; Glucose tolerance; Glycated albumin; Haemoglobin A1c

Funding

  1. South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)
  2. National Treasury under its Economic Competitiveness and Support Package [MRC-RFA-UFSP-01-2013/VMH]
  3. South African National Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundTo assess whether the agreement between fasting glucose and glycated proteins is affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a community-based sample of 1621 mixed-ancestry South Africans.MethodsCKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60ml/min/1.73m(2). Fasting plasma glucose and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentrations were measured by enzymatic hexokinase method and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively, with fructosamine and glycated albumin measured by immunoturbidimetry and enzymatic method, respectively.ResultsOf those with CKD (n=96), 79, 16 and 5% where in stages 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Those with CKD had higher levels of HbA1c (6.2 vs. 5.7%; p < 0.0001), glycated albumin (15.0 vs. 13.0%; p < 0.0001) and fructosamine levels (269.7 vs. 236.4 mu mol/l; p < 0.0001), compared to those without CKD. Higher fasting glucose levels were associated with higher HbA1c, glycated albumin and fructosamine, independent of age, gender, and CKD. However, the association with HbA1c and glycated albumin differed by CKD status, at the upper concentrations of the respective markers (interaction term for both: p <= 0.095).ConclusionOur results suggest that although HbA1c and glycated albumin perform acceptably under conditions of normoglycaemia, these markers correlate less well with blood glucose levels in people with CKD who are not on dialysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available