4.6 Article

Prognostic Value of Stress Dynamic Computed Tomography Perfusion With Computed Tomography Delayed Enhancement

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1721-1734

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.017

Keywords

CT delayed enhancement; dynamic CT perfusion; prognostic value

Funding

  1. Siemens Japan
  2. Daiichi Sankyo
  3. Fuji Pharma
  4. Fujifilm RI Pharma
  5. Eisai

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of stress dynamic computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) with CT delayed enhancement (CTDE) in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and in subgroups of patients with stent, heavy calcification, or stenosis. BACKGROUND The prognostic value of stress dynamic CTP with CTDE is unknown. METHODS Participants were 540 patients with suspected or known CAD. Major adverse cardiac event(s) (MACE) consisted of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or hospitalization for congestive heart failure. Ischemic score was calculated by scoring the reduction of normalized myocardial blood flow in 16 segments excluding areas of myocardial scarring. Ischemic perfusion defect (IPD) was defined as Ischemic score >= 4. Scar score was also calculated by scoring the transmural extent of scarring in each segment on CTDE. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 43 MACEs occurred. By adding IPD to obstructive CAD (>= 50% stenosis) on coronary CT angiography, the concordance index for predicting MACEs increased from 0.73 to 0.82 in patients with suspected CAD (p = 0.028) and from 0.61 to 0.73 in patients with known CAD (p = 0.004). IPD and scar score of >= 4 were independent predictors when adjusted for each other in patients with suspected (adjusted hazard ratios: 7.5 [p < 0.001] and 3.0 [p = 0.034], respectively) or known CAD (adjusted hazard ratios: 4.4 [p = 0.001] and 3.2 [p = 0.024], respectively). Patients with IPD had a higher annualized event rate than those without IPD in subgroups of those with stent (11.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001), heavy calcification (13.3% vs. 3.1%; p < 0.001), 50% to 69% stenosis (8.8% vs. 1.0%; p < 0.001), or >= 70% stenosis (12.4% vs. 3.6%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Stress dynamic CTP with CTDE had incremental prognostic value over CT angiography in each group with suspected or known CAD and was prognostically useful in subgroups of patients with stent, heavy calcification, or obstructive CAD. IPD and myocardial scarring may play complementary roles in prognostic stratification. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available