4.5 Article

Comprehensive Eye Diagram Analysis: A Transfer Learning Approach

Journal

IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2947705

Keywords

Transfer learning; eye diagram analysis; impairment diagnosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61705016]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019RC12]
  3. BUPT Excellent Ph.D.
  4. Students Foundation [CX2019313]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A deep transfer learning (TL)-based comprehensive eye diagram analysis and diagnosis scheme that can output essential eye diagram parameters, estimate fiber link length, calculate Q-factor, and diagnose device imperfection-induced impairments is proposed. TL can be used to extract system information and optical signal characteristics contained in eye diagrams and apply the learned knowledge and extracted features obtained from source tasks to related target tasks. As a source task, the proposed method estimates the transmission distance of a fiber link using convolutional neural network (CNN)based eye diagram recognition. The feature extraction layers of the CNN are transferred to six target tasks involving the recognition of cross percentage, levels 0 and 1, eye height and width, and Q-factor. Using TL reduces the total training times for on-off keying (OOK) and pulse amplitude modulation (PAM4) formats by >95% and 60%, respectively. We also investigated six common PAM4 impairments caused by transmitter imperfection by setting the impairment category identification as source task and the impairment-degree diagnoses as target tasks. The TL methods consistently outperformed non-TL methods, with higher accuracies and significantly reduced training times. The proposed impairment diagnosis technique should be useful in impairment healing and fault correction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available