4.3 Article

Evaluation of New Components in Modified Scholten's Medium for the Detection of Somatic Coliphages

Journal

FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 148-157

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-020-09419-z

Keywords

Somatic coliphages; Bacteriophage; Viral indicators; Water quality; Culture medium

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [AGL2016-75536]
  2. Aquaphage project by the Regional Development Fund (FEDER) of the European Union (FEDER 2014-2020 Operational Program) [2016 PROD 00030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enteric bacteriophages (somatic coliphages, F-specific coliphages or both together) are now recognized as useful viral indicators in water, shellfish, and biosolids and are being progressively included in national and international sanitary regulations. Among them, somatic coliphages have an advantage in that they usually outnumber F-RNA coliphages in water environments. Their enumeration using Modified Scholten's (MS) media, following the ISO 10705-2 standard for the growth of Escherichia coli host strain WG5, is highly efficient and a common practice worldwide. These media contain a high concentration of nutrients, which may be modified to save costs without loss of bacterial growth host efficiency. This study explored reducing the concentration of nutrients in the current formulation and/or incorporating new components to improve the host bacterial growth and/or the enumeration of somatic coliphages at an affordable analytical cost. A twofold dilution of the original MS media was found not to affect the bacterial growth rate. The addition of combinations of assayed compounds to twofold diluted MS media slightly enhanced its analytical performance without altering bacterial growth. By generating savings in both cost and time while maintaining optimal results, media dilution could be applied to design new simple applications for coliphage enumeration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available