4.7 Article

Effects of hydrodynamic cavitation, low-level thermal and low-level alkaline pre-treatments on sludge solubilisation

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104750

Keywords

Hydrodynamic cavitation; Low-alkaline treatment; Low-thermal treatment; Sludge solubilisation; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. Autonomous Province of Trento, Italy [L6/99, S155/2013/693264/12.1]
  2. Officine Parisi s.r.l.
  3. Fondazione Caritro, Trento

Ask authors/readers for more resources

WAS is a polluting and hazardous waste generated in WWTPs that must be treated to prevent pollution and human health risks. Anaerobic digestion is the most used process for sludge stabilization. However, it must be improved in terms of both speed and extend of degradation. With the purpose of reducing the energy and chemical consumption linked to sludge treatment, in this study, different anaerobic digestion pre-treatments such as low-level mechanical (hydrodynamic cavitation, 2 bar), low-level thermal (50 degrees C) and low-level alkaline (NaOH, KOH and Ca(OH)(2), pH 10) methods, and a combination thereof, were tested as strategies to improve sludge solubilisation. When the pre-treatments were used alone, the alkaline pre-treatment showed the highest sludge solubilisation. Among the alkaline reagents tested, NaOH and KOH led to higher DDPCOD (41.6 and 39.4%), while only 8.4% was achieved by using Ca(OH)(2). However, the low-level hydrodynamic cavitation assisted thermo-alkaline pre-treatment was the most efficient in terms of both sludge solubilisation (DDPCOD = 53.0%) and energy efficiency (EE = 64.5 mg Delta SCOD kJ(-1)). The synergetic effects of the combined pre-treatment were also confirmed by the highest release of EPS. Furthermore, cytometric analyses showed that the main mechanism involved in sludge solubilisation for the investigated pre-treatments was flocs disintegration rather than cell lysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available