4.5 Review

Symptoms and healthcare contact preceding sudden cardiac death in persons aged 1-49 years

Journal

TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 119-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2020.01.003

Keywords

Sudden cardiac death; Symptoms; Youth; Prevention; Epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the symptoms and healthcare contact preceding sudden cardiac death (SCD) in individuals aged 1-49 years, revealing a high frequency of cardiac and non-specific symptoms prior to SCD. Many SCD victims had contacted the healthcare system before death based on their symptoms, but only a few were diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.
Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is a leading cause of death among persons in their youth and early middleage. To prevent SCD it is crucial to identify persons at high-risk of SCD. Knowledge of symptoms and medical contact prior to SCD could potentially aid in the identification of high-risk persons in the general population who would benefit from further investigation. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of symptoms and healthcare contact preceding SCD in persons aged 1-49 years, and to explore how the symptoms differ according to SCD cause and age of the deceased. There was a high frequency of both cardiac and non-specific symptoms prior to SCD. Additionally, many SCD victims contacted the healthcare system prior to death on the basis of their symptoms and only a few were diagnosed with cardiovascular disease. This information underlines that young persons report ing potential cardiac symptoms should also be thoroughly examined. Furthermore, such symptoms could be used in combination with other easily accessible information in non-invasive prediction models aiming at identifying persons at high risk of SCD that would benefit from further investigation and possibly treatment. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available