4.4 Article

Empirical Study on the Properties of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems and Their Impact on Traffic Flow and String Stability

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
Volume 2674, Issue 4, Pages 471-484

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0361198120911047

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems are standard equipment in many commercially available vehicles. They are considered the first step of automation, and their market penetration rate is expected to rise, along with the interest of researchers worldwide to assess their impact in relation to traffic flow and stability. These properties are currently discussed mainly through microsimulation studies and empirical observations, with the first being the most common. Experimental observations can draw safer conclusions about the behavior of such systems, but the literature is limited. In this work, an experimental campaign with five vehicles equipped with ACC was conducted at the proving ground of AstaZero in Sweden to improve understanding on the properties of ACC systems and their functionality under real driving conditions. The main parameters under investigation are the response time of controllers, the available time headway settings, and the stability of the car-platoon. The results show that the response time range for the controllers is between 1.7 and 2.5 s, significantly longer than the values reported in the literature. The range of the time headway settings was found to be quite broad. Finally, a dataset of perturbations on a variety of equilibrium speeds of the car-platoon and of variable magnitudes was created. Results clearly highlight the instability of the car-platoon. Instability is also displayed even for slight perturbations derived by variability in the road gradient. Numerical differentiation on the altitude shows a negative correlation with the speed trajectory of the leading vehicle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available