4.7 Article

Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1), TP53, RAS/BRAF and KIT aberrations in testicular germ cell tumors

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 376, Issue 2, Pages 367-376

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.04.016

Keywords

Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1); TP53; KIT; Testicular germ cell tumors; Next generation sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. Internal Grant Agency of the Czech Ministry of Health [IGA NT/12414-5]
  2. Charles University Grant Agency [GAUK 56413]
  3. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [NPU I LO1604]
  4. University Hospital Motol, Prague [00064203FNM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1), a zinc-finger transcription factor essential for testis development and function, along with other genes, was investigated for their role in the pathogenesis of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT). Methods: In total, 284 TGCT and 100 control samples were investigated, including qPCR for WT1 expression and BRAF mutation, p53 immunohistochemistry detection, and massively parallel amplicon sequencing. Results: WTI was significantly (p < 0.0001) under-expressed in TGCT, with an increased ratio of exon 5-lacking isoforms, reaching low levels in chemo-naive relapsed TGCT patients vs. high levels in chemotherapy-pretreated relapsed patients. BRAE V600E mutation was identified in 1% of patients only. p53 protein was lowly expressed in TGCT metastases compared to the matched primary tumors. Of 9 selected TGCT-linked genes, RAS/BRAF and WTI mutations were frequent while significant TP53 and KIT variants were not detected (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: WT1 has been identified as a novel factor involved in TGCT pathogenesis, with a potential prognostic impact. Distinct biologic nature of the two types of relapses occurring in TGCT has been demonstrated. Differential mutation rate of the key TGCT-related genes has been documented. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available