4.2 Article

Retrospective study evaluating the performance of risk factors for invasive mold infections in liver transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tid.13223

Keywords

Aspergillus; fungal infection; liver transplant; mold; prophylaxis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Mold infections in liver transplant are associated with high mortality. Guidelines recommend prophylaxis targeted against mold based upon risk factors of fulminant hepatic failure, retransplantation, reoperation, and renal replacement therapy post-transplant. It is not known if these factors identify risk of mold infection at every center. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of adult liver transplant recipients at a single center from 2010 to 2014. The association between risk factors and invasive mold infection and effect of antifungal prophylaxis were determined. Results Five hundred thirty-four liver transplant recipients were identified. The overall incidence of invasive mold infection was 0.9% (N = 5). The incidence in patients with (N = 128) and without (N = 406) risk factors was 0.78% and 0.98%, respectively. Antifungal prophylaxis with mold activity was administered to 23/128 (18%) with risk factors, and none developed infection. No mold-active prophylaxis was given to 105/128 (82%) with risk factors, and incidence of mold infection was 0.95% (N = 1). Number needed to treat was 105. Conclusions Traditional risk factors for mold infection in liver transplant performed poorly. These results underscore the importance of transplant center-specific data to inform adoption of an antifungal prophylactic strategy. Studies are needed to determine alternative risk factors to facilitate appropriate targeting of antifungals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available