4.5 Article

Uncovering Differently Expressed Markers and Heterogeneity on Human Pancreatic Cancer

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100749

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30CA033572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discovery of biomarkers is critical to understand tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment. To determine differently expressed makers on cancer tissue for comprehensive profiling, the multiplexed tissue imaging mass cytometer (IMC) which uniquely combines time-of-flight mass spectrometry with metal-labeling technology to enable breakthrough discovery on single cell level was employed to investigate the expression of seven markers related to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA), vimentin, collagen I, cytokeratin 7, pankeratin], tumor proliferation (Ki-67), and human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR) on human pancreatic cancer tissue. The differencewas analyzed using bioinformatic tools. We observed the high expression of alpha-SMA, vimentin, collagen I, and Ki-67 on grade I but not on grade III. HLA-DRwas highly expressed on grade I/III but not on grade II. Overall, the expression of markers has elucidated the heterogeneity intratumors. Additionally, to identify biomarkers on pancreatic cancer cells by blind systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX), aptamer pull-down assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were used. Mortalin was identified as a potential a prognostic marker of pancreatic cancer. Our studies demonstrate that the IMC and blind SELEXmight be implemented to discover biomarkers which can be used to better understand tumor biology and biomedical research applications. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Neoplasia Press, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available