4.1 Article

The health and economic burden of podoconiosis in Ethiopia

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/traa003

Keywords

burden; cost; economic; lymphoedema; podoconiosis

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust London, UK [201900/Z/16/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust London, UK core grant [106680/Z/14/Z]
  3. MRC [MR/R015600/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Wellcome Trust [201900/Z/16/Z, 106680/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Podoconiosis is one of the leading causes of lymphoedema-related morbidity in low-income settings, but little is known about the scale of its health and economic impact. This information is required to inform control programme planning and policy. In this study, we estimated the health and economic burden of podoconiosis in Ethiopia. Methods: We developed a model to estimate the health burden attributed to podoconiosis in terms of the number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and the economic burden. We estimated the economic burden by quantifying the treatment and morbidity-management costs incurred by the healthcare system in managing clinical cases, patients' out-of-pocket costs and their productivity costs. Results: In 2017, there were 1.5 million cases of podoconiosis in Ethiopia, which corresponds to 172073 DALYs or 182 per 100000 people. The total economic burden of podoconiosis in Ethiopia is estimated to be US$213.2 million annually and 91.1% of this resulted from productivity costs. The average economic burden per podoconiosis case was US$136.9. Conclusions: The national cost of podoconiosis is formidable. If control measures are scaled up and the morbidity burden reduced, this will lead to Ethiopia saving millions of dollars. Our estimates provide important benchmark economic costs to programme planners, policymakers and donors for resource allocation and priority setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available