4.7 Review

Recent advances in potentiometric biosensors

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115803

Keywords

Potentiometry; Ion-selective electrode; Potentiometric biosensing; Bioreceptor; Biosensor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41876108, 21575158, 21677172]
  2. Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) [OF2018NO01]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y728021021]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1400700]
  5. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province [tspd20181215, tsqn201909163]
  6. Key Research and Development Program of Yantai [2018ZHGY053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potentiometry based on ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) has been injected with new vigor and gone through a renaissance with the improvements in the detection limits and selectivities of ISEs, the introduction of new materials, new sensing concepts (from conventional potentiometry to dynamic electrochemistry approaches), and deeper theoretical understanding and modelling of the potentiometric responses of ISEs. The new breakthroughs encourage innovations in ion sensing and biosensing applications. Moreover, with the introduction of new bioreceptors, such as enzymes, antibodies, aptamers, peptides, versatile sensing protocols have been designed for a broad range of different target molecules by using ISEs as powerful transducers. This paper reviews the recent trends in potentiometric biosensors. Their applications in biosensing of metal ions, small molecules, DNA, proteins, bacteria and toxicities have been discussed. This review provides the outlook of the potentiometric biosensing based on the integration of potentiometric ISEs with new materials and emerging techniques. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available