4.6 Article

L-carnitine supplementation during in vitro culture regulates oxidative stress in embryos from bovine aged oocytes

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages 64-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.11.036

Keywords

L-carnitine; Oocyte aging; Bovine; Embryo development

Funding

  1. Jilin Province Education Department [JJKH20191132KJ]
  2. Yanbian University Research project [2018-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aging oocytes undergo various molecular, cellular, and biochemical changes. Aging of oocytes results in reduced embryo developmental capacity and blastocyst quality, which is thought to be caused partly by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This study aimed to determine the effect of L-carnitine (LC) on the development of embryos formed from aged oocytes in vitro. The development and quality of the blastocysts in the LC-treated group were significantly higher than those in the untreated aged group after in vitro fertilization (IVF). In addition, after LC treatment, the level of intracellular ROS in aged group significantly decreased, and glutathione (GSH) levels significantly increased compared with those in the untreated aged group. There was no significant difference in the mitochondrial membrane potential among the three groups. Moreover, ROS could induce autophagy and LC3 antibody was widely used as a marker for detecting autophagy. The fluorescence intensity of LC3 in the aged group was significantly higher than that of LC3 in the LC-treated group. Furthermore, Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction showed that the mRNA levels of antioxidation genes GPX4 and SOD1 were significantly higher in embryos from LC-treated group than in those from the untreated aged group. In summary, our results indicated that LC can improve the developmental capacity of embryos from aging oocytes in vitro by reducing oxidative stress. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available