4.5 Article

Temperature and thermal growing season variations along elevational gradients on a sub-alpine, temperate China

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue 1-2, Pages 15-24

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-019-03067-5

Keywords

Spatio-temporal variation; Lapse rates; Treeline; Growing season; Montane temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fully and accurately studying temperature variations in montane areas are conducive to a better understanding of climate modeling and climate-growth relationships on regional scales. To explore the spatio-temporal changes in air and soil temperatures and their relationship in montane areas, on-site monitoring over 2 years (2015 and 2016) was conducted at nine different elevations from 2040 to 2740 m a.s.l. on Luya Mountain in the semiarid region of China. The results showed that the annual mean of air temperature lapse rate (ATLR) was 0.67 degrees C/100 m. ATLR varied obviously in different months within a range of 0.57~0.79 degrees C/100 m. The annual mean of the soil temperature lapse rate (STLR) was 0.48 degrees C/100 m. Seasonally, monthly mean soil temperature did not show a consistent pattern with regard to elevation. The relationships between air and soil temperatures showed piecewise changes. Soil was decoupled from the air temperature in cold winter and early spring. The parameters of the growing season based on the two temperature types had no corresponding relations, and seasonal mean of soil temperature showed the smallest value at mid-elevation rather than in the treeline ecotone. Based on these changes, our results emphasized that altitudinal and seasonal variability caused by local factors (such as snow cover and soil moisture) should be taken into full consideration in microclimate extrapolation and treeline prediction in montane areas, especially in relation to soil temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available