4.5 Article

Prevalence and Penetrance of Major Genes and Polygenes for Colorectal Cancer

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 404-412

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0693

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, NIH [UM1 CA167551]
  2. Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [U01/U24 CA097735]
  3. Mayo Clinic Cooperative Family Registry for Colon Cancer Studies [U01/U24 CA074800]
  4. Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry [U01/U24 CA074783]
  5. Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [U01/U24 CA074794]
  6. USC Consortium Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [U01/U24 CA074799]
  7. Cancer Surveillance System of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  8. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute [N01-CN-67009, N01-PC-35142, HHSN2612013000121]
  9. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  10. California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program [103885]
  11. National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program [HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000034C, U58DP003862-01]
  12. NIH [R01CA170122]
  13. Centre for Research Excellence [APP1042021]
  14. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia [APP1074383]
  15. Cancer Research UK [11174, 20861] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although high-risk mutations in identified major susceptibility genes (DNA mismatch repair genes and MUTYH) account for some familial aggregation of colorectal cancer, their population prevalence and the causes of the remaining familial aggregation are not known. Methods: We studied the families of 5,744 colorectal cancer cases (probands) recruited from population cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia and screened probands for mutations in mismatch repair genes and MUTYH. We conducted modified segregation analyses using the cancer history of first-degree relatives, conditional on the proband's age at diagnosis. We estimated the prevalence of mutations in the identified genes, the prevalence of HR for unidentified major gene mutations, and the variance of the residual polygenic component. Results: We estimated that 1 in 279 of the population carry mutations in mismatch repair genes (MLH1 = 1 in 1,946, MSH2 = 1 in 2,841, MSH6 = 1 in 758, PMS2 = 1 in 714), 1 in 45 carry mutations in MUTYH, and 1 in 504 carry mutations associated with an average 31-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer in unidentified major genes. The estimated polygenic variance was reduced by 30% to 50% after allowing for unidentified major genes and decreased from 3.3 for age <40 years to 0.5 for age >= 70 years (equivalent to sibling relative risks of 5.1 to 1.3, respectively). Conclusions: Unidentified major genes might explain one third to one half of the missing heritability of colorectal cancer. Impact: Our findings could aid gene discovery and development of better colorectal cancer risk prediction models. (C)2016 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available