4.6 Article

Kinematic Analyses and Radiometric Dating of the Large-Scale Paleogene Two-Phase Faulting Along the Median Tectonic Line, Southwest Japan

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018TC005372

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fukada of Japan
  2. MEXT KAKENHI [26109004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Median Tectonic Line (MTL) in Southwest Japan, a major east-west trending arc-parallel fault, has been defined as the boundary fault between the Cretaceous Sambagawa metamorphic rocks and the Ryoke granitic and metamorphic rocks, which are unconformably covered by the Upper Cretaceous Izumi Group. Based on the detailed fieldwork and microstructural studies of fault rocks, we reconstruct the kinematic history along the MTL during the Paleogene, which can be divided into the Ichinokawa and pre-Tobe phases. While the Ichinokawa phase is defined by large-scale, top-to-the-north normal faulting, the pre-Tobe phase is represented by large-scale, high-angle right-stepping en echelon faults almost parallel to the MTL in the Upper Cretaceous Izumi Group. We found that left-handed en echelon folds have developed along the right-stepping faults, which contain 25-60m wide cataclasite and fault gouge. Both map scale en echelon folds and microstructures (e.g., composite planar structures) in the fault rocks suggest that they were formed by sinistral-reverse faulting with top-to-the-SW kinematics. Furthermore, based on the new K-Ar age dating of authigenic illite from the fault gouge along the MTL and right-stepping faults, it can be concluded that the MTL was activated in two discrete stages at approximately 59 Ma (Ichinokawa phase) and 47-46 Ma (pre-Tobe phase). Based on these results, we reappraise the kinematic framework of the MTL in the Paleogene, which can be interpreted as the record of the movements of the subducting oceanic plate relative to the continental plate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available