4.6 Article

Timing of Cenozoic Extension in the Southern Stillwater Range and Dixie Valley, Nevada

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019TC005757

Keywords

Stillwater Range; Dixie Valley; Extensional faulting; Thermochronology; Inverse modeling

Funding

  1. National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey
  2. Ann and Gordon Getty Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Dixie Valley fault bounds the east side of the Stillwater Range in west-central Nevada and last ruptured in 1954. Offset basalts indicate that slip began more recently than 14 Ma, and prior work has interpreted the southern segment as an active low-angle normal fault. Oligocene igneous rocks in the southern Stillwater Range were steeply tilted during large-magnitude extension prior to 14 Ma. To refine the timing of early extension and the onset of slip on the Dixie Valley fault, we collected two transects of samples for apatite fission track, apatite and zircon (U-Th)/He (AHe and ZHe), and apatite He-4/He-3 thermochronometry. Apatite fission track ages from the Oligocene IXL pluton indicate rapid cooling 18-14 Ma, and AHe and ZHe ages from the Cretaceous La Plata Canyon pluton indicate rapid cooling 16-19 Ma. We interpret these data to record cooling during rapid extension. AHe ages from the IXL pluton are 6-8 Ma and record cooling during slip on the Dixie Valley fault. We modeled these ages and He-4/He-3 spectra from one sample as the result of cooling during exhumation of a tilted fault block at a constant extension rate. The model predicts slip on the Dixie Valley fault beginning 8 Ma. Although it does not constrain the initial fault dip, the model illustrates how a low-angle fault requires a higher extension rate to reproduce cooling ages. Consequently, we prefer a high-angle southern Dixie Valley fault for strain compatibility with the high-angle northern segment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available