4.7 Article

Electronic classification of barcoded particles for multiplexed detection using supervised machine learning analysis

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120791

Keywords

Electronically barcoded particles; Biosensor; Electrical impedance; Support vector machine; Biomarker

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IDBR 1556253]
  2. School of Engineering at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  3. Department of Electrical Engineering at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wearable biosensors are of great interest in recent years due to their potential in health related applications. Multiplex biomarker analysis is needed in wearable devices to improve the sensitivity and reliability. Electronic barcoding of micro-particles has the possibility to enable multiplexed biomarker analysis. Compared with traditional optical and plasmonic methods for barcoding, electronically barcoded particles can be classified using ultra-compact electronic readout platforms. Nano-electronic barcoding works by depositing a thin layer of oxide on the top half of a micro-particle. The thickness and dielectric property of the oxide layer can be tuned to modulate the frequency dependent impedance signature of the particles. A one to one correspondence between a target biomarker and each barcoded particle can potentially be established using this technique. The barcoded particles could be tested with wearable devices to enable multiplex analysis for portable point-of-care diagnostics and real-time monitoring. In this work, we fabricated nine barcoded particles by forming oxide layers of different thicknesses and different dielectric materials using atomic layer deposition and assessed the ability to accurately classify particle barcodes using multi-frequency impedance cytometry in conjunction with supervised machine learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available