4.7 Article

Development of the simultaneous colorimetric enzymatic detection of sucrose, fructose and glucose using a microfluidic paper-based analytical device

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120302

Keywords

Sucrose; Fructose; Glucose; Microfluidic paper-based analytical device; Biosensor

Funding

  1. Research and Researcher for Industry (RRi), Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [MSD59I0039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we propose the first fabrication of a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (mu PAD) as a simple, rapid and selective method for the simultaneous detection of sucrose, fructose and glucose for quality monitoring in the sugar industry. Multiplex detection of the three analytes was achieved by three detection zones designed on a single device. Each detection zone on the mu PAD was modified with enzymes, chromogenic reagents and specific substrates. The enzymatic reactions between the specific enzymes, chromogenic reagents and their corresponding substrates yielded different colored products: brown for sucrose, blue for fructose and pink for glucose. All the reaction conditions were evaluated. The limits of detection were determined to be 0.9 mM, 0.8 mM and 0.4 mM for sucrose, fructose and glucose, respectively. The proposed mu PAD successfully monitored sucrose, fructose and glucose within 11 min using a signal device and obtained a spike recovery of 100-103% for sucrose, 98-103% for fructose, and 100-102% for glucose. The mu PAD was applied to detect sucrose, fructose and glucose in real samples, and the results were in good agreement with those obtained using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The proposed mu PAD provides several advantages, including ease of use, fast results and low cost. Therefore, the developed mu PAD is suitable for application in the sugar industry for monitoring sucrose, fructose and glucose in parallel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available