4.6 Article

Extended right colectomy, left colectomy, or segmental left colectomy for splenic flexure carcinomas: a European multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07431-9

Keywords

Splenic flexure carcinoma; Extended right colectomy; Left colectomy; Segmental left colectomy; Propensity score matching; Postoperative complications

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the outcomes of extended right, left, and segmental left colectomy for splenic flexure carcinoma patients in a multicenter European sample. While extended right colectomy was associated with increased risk of postoperative complications, there were no significant differences in overall survival or disease-free survival between the three procedures. The study supports the use of colon-sparing surgical techniques such as segmental left colectomy for the resection of splenic flexure carcinomas.
Background The surgical resection of the splenic flexure carcinoma (SFC) is challenging and the optimal surgical procedure for SFCs remains a matter of debate. The present study aimed to compare in a multicenter European sample of patients the short- and long-term outcomes of extended right (ERC) vs. left (LC) vs. segmental left colectomy (SLC) for SFCs. Methods This retrospective multicenter study analyzed the surgical and oncological outcomes of SFC patients undergoing elective curative intent surgery between 2000 and 2018. Descriptive and exploratory analyses were first conducted on the whole sample. Outcomes of the different procedures (ERC vs. LC vs. SLC) were then compared using propensity score matching for multilevel treatment. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results From a total of 399 SFC patients, 143 (35.8%) underwent ERC, 131 (32.8%) underwent LC, and 125 (31.4%) underwent SLC. Overall, 297 (74.4%) were laparoscopic procedures. An increase in operative time, time to flatus, time to regular diet, and hospital stay was observed with the progressive extension of SFC resection. ERC was associated with significantly increased risk of postoperative ileus compared to both LC and SLC. A significantly greater number of lymph nodes were retrieved by ERC, but the objective of at least 12 retrieved lymph nodes was achieved in 85% of patients, without procedure-related differences. No differences were observed in OS or DFS between ERC, LC, and SLC. Conclusion The present study supports the resection of SFCs by colon-sparing surgical techniques, such as SLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available