4.7 Article

Modified wear behavior of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy by direct current assisted ultrasonic surface rolling process

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 381, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125122

Keywords

DC-USRP; Friction and wear properties; Ti6Al4V; Selective laser melting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51627805]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of Guangdong Province [2015A030312003]
  3. Science and Technology Research Projects of Guangdong Province [2014B010129003, 2015B020238008, 2016B090931006, 2017B090901025]
  4. National Key Research and Development program of China [2018YF2001604]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ti6Al4V alloy samples prepared by selective laser melting were treated by three different post-treatments: namely heat-treatment, ultrasonic surface rolling process (USRP) and direct current assisted ultrasonic surface rolling process (DC-USRP). Wear behaviors were evaluated using a block-on-disc rig under lubrication conditions. Results showed that the DC-USRP treated sample exhibited the lowest wear rate of 1 x 10(-6) mm(3) N-1 m(-1), compared to that of the as-built (4 x 10(-5) mm(3) N-1 m(-1)), heat-treated (2 x 10(-5) mm(3) N-1 m(-1)) and USRP-treated samples (5 x 10(-6) mm(3) N-1 m(-1)). Consistent with changes in the wear rate, the friction coefficient was also gradually reduced. The as-built and heat-treated samples showed severe abrasive wear and delamination, while the USRP and DC-USRP treated samples displayed only mild abrasive wear. The improved wear resistance of the USRP and DC-USRP treated samples was attributed to the modified lubrication mechanism, increased hardness and compressive residual stress. Moreover, the wear resistance of the DC-USRP treated samples decreased with the increasing depth from the surface due to the effect of gradient work hardening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available