4.5 Article

Optimization study of the Halbach permanent magnetic guideway for high temperature superconducting magnetic levitation

Journal

SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ab6ec0

Keywords

high temperature superconductors; Halbach PMG; maglev optimization; magnetic field; magnetic forces

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875485]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2019YFG0286]
  3. preresearch project of Manned Spaceflight [010206]
  4. China Academy of Engineering Consulting Research Project [2018-ZD-16]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power at Southwest Jiaotong University [2019TPL_07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the combined advantages of no-contact friction and self-stable levitation, high temperature superconducting magnetic levitation (HTS Maglev) has significant potential for rail transit applications. In order to further improve the carrying capacity of the HTS maglev system, it is necessary to optimize the permanent magnet guideway (PMG). In this paper, the original Halbach PMG was optimized and a new PMG with better performance was designed and manufactured. The magnetic field and magnetic forces were calculated by the finite element method, and the size and magnetization direction of each PM in the PMG were optimized. Then, the magnetic field above the optimized PMG were measured and compared with the original Halbach PMG as well as the levitation and guidance force of the bulk high temperature superconductors. Experimental data show that the magnetic field above the optimized PMG is effectively enhanced and the levitation and guidance force of the superconductors increase by 12.2% and 11.3%, respectively. This study can provide the foundation for the further optimization of PMGs and the research of large load HTS Maglev technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available