4.5 Article

Prediction of fatigue failure of corrosion affected riveted connections in steel structures

Journal

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1524-1538

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1713166

Keywords

Fatigue; corrosion; S-N curve; steel structures; riveted connections; first-passage method

Funding

  1. Metro Trains Melbourne, Australia
  2. Australian Research Council [DP140101547, LP150100413, DP170102211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Corrosion of steel is now a worldwide issue, threatening the safety of steel structures. Literature suggests that little research has been conducted on the prediction of fatigue failures of connections subjected to simultaneous fatigue and corrosion. This paper proposes a new method to predict the failure of connections subjected to fatigue and corrosion. A model is developed to determine the effect of corrosion on S-N curve of corroded steel. The fatigue damage to corroded connections is modelled as a stochastic process which considers the corrosion effects on both stress range and S-N curve. The first-passage probability method is used to determine the time-dependent probability of fatigue failure of connections subjected to fatigue and corrosion. A case study is then provided to demonstrate the application of the proposed methodology. It is found in the paper that not considering the effect of corrosion on S-N curve can lead to 15.45% reduction of the probability of fatigue failure of corroded connections over 150 years, which can be catastrophic. It has also been found, through sensitivity analysis, that corrosion rate can considerably affect the probability of fatigue failure in longer term. The methodology proposed in this paper can help structural engineers and asset managers in making decisions regarding the repair and/or maintenance of connections subjected to the combined effects of corrosion and fatigue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available