4.5 Article

Association of Prostate Cancer Risk Variants with TMPRSS2:ERG Status: Evidence for Distinct Molecular Subtypes

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 745-749

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1078

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Awards
  2. NCI [R01 CA136578, R25 CA112355]
  3. David Mazzone Research Awards Program
  4. NIH
  5. Swedish Research Council [2009-7309]
  6. Royal Physiographic Society in Lund, Sweden
  7. [CA34944]
  8. [CA40360]
  9. [CA097193]
  10. [HL26490]
  11. [HL34595]
  12. [UM1CA167552]
  13. [CA133891]
  14. [CA141298]
  15. [P01CA055075]
  16. [CA136578]
  17. [U01CA098233]
  18. [P50CA090381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Numerous genetic variants have been confirmed as prostate cancer risk factors. These variants may confer susceptibility to the development of specific molecular alterations during tumor initiation and progression. The TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion occurs in roughly 50% of prostate cancers. Genetic risk variants may influence the development of this fusion. We sought to determine whether prostate cancer risk variants are differentially associated with TMPRSS2: ERG fusion-positive and negative cancer. Methods: In the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Physicians' Health Study Tumor Cohort, we evaluated the associations of 39 prostate cancer risk SNPs with TMPRSS2: ERG fusion status, measured by ERG protein expression. Logistic regression was performed to generate OR and 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcome was ERG(-) (n = 227) versus ERG(-) ( n = 260) prostate cancer. A secondary outcome was ERG(-) or ERG(-) cancer versus controls without cancer. Results: Six of 39 SNPs were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with ERG(-) versus ERG(-) disease. Three SNPs were exclusively associated with the risk of ERG(-), one with risk of ERG(-), and two with associations trending in opposite directions for ERG(-) and ERG(-). Only two significant SNPs would be expected by chance. Conclusions: Prostate cancer genetic risk variants are differentially associated with the development of ERG(-) and ERG(-) prostate cancer. Impact: Our findings suggest the molecular process of prostate carcinogenesis may be distinct for men with different underlying genetic predisposition. When examining risk factors for prostate cancer, the integration of molecular subtypes may enhance understanding of the etiology of this disease. (C) 2016 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available