4.5 Article

Models as Approximations II: A Model-Free Theory of Parametric Regression

Journal

STATISTICAL SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 545-565

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/18-STS694

Keywords

Ancillarity of regressors; misspecification; econometrics; sandwich estimator; bootstrap; bagging

Funding

  1. NSF [DMS-14-06563]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop a model-free theory of general types of parametric regression for i.i.d. observations. The theory replaces the parameters of parametric models with statistical functionals, to be called regression functionals, defined on large nonparametric classes of joint x-y distributions, without assuming a correct model. Parametric models are reduced to heuristics to suggest plausible objective functions. An example of a regression functional is the vector of slopes of linear equations fitted by OLS to largely arbitrary x-y distributions, without assuming a linear model (see Part I). More generally, regression functionals can be defined by minimizing objective functions, solving estimating equations, or with ad hoc constructions. In this framework, it is possible to achieve the following: (1) define a notion of wellspecification for regression functionals that replaces the notion of correct specification of models, (2) propose a well-specification diagnostic for regression functionals based on reweighting distributions and data, (3) decompose sampling variability of regression functionals into two sources, one due to the conditional response distribution and another due to the regressor distribution interacting with misspecification, both of order N-1/2, (4) exhibit plug-in/sandwich estimators of standard error as limit cases of x-y bootstrap estimators, and (5) provide theoretical heuristics to indicate that x-y bootstrap standard errors may generally be preferred over sandwich estimators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available