Journal
SPINE
Volume 45, Issue 14, Pages 1009-1015Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003442
Keywords
adult spinal deformity; cost-utility analysis; health economics; health utility; Monte Carlo simulation; nonunion; pseudarthrosis; recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2; reoperation; revision surgery
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Study Design. Economic modeling of data from a multicenter, prospective registry. Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost utility of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background Data. ASD surgery is expensive and presents risk of major complications. BMP is frequently used off-label to reduce the risk of pseudarthrosis. Methods. Of 522 ASD patients with fusion of five or more spinal levels, 367 (70%) had at least 2-year follow-up. Total direct cost was calculated by adding direct costs of the index surgery and any subsequent reoperations or readmissions. Cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were calculated from the change in preoperative to final follow-up SF-6D health utility score. A decision-analysis model comparing BMPversusno-BMP was developed with pseudarthrosis as the primary outcome. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using mixed first-order and second-order Monte Carlo simulations. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed by varying cost, probability, and QALY estimates (Alpha = 0.05). Results. BMP was used in the index surgery for 267 patients (73%). The mean (+/- standard deviation) direct cost of BMP for the index surgery was $14,000 +/- $6400. Forty patients (11%) underwent revision surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis (BMP group, 8.6%; no-BMP group, 17%;P = 0.022). The mean 2-year direct cost was significantly higher for patients with pseudarthrosis ($138,000 +/- $17,000) than for patients without pseudarthrosis ($61,000 +/- $25,000) (P < 0.001). Simulation analysis revealed that BMP was associated with positive incremental utility in 67% of patients and considered favorable at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY in >52% of patients. Conclusion. BMP use was associated with reduction in revisions for symptomatic pseudarthrosis in ASD surgery. Cost-utility analysis suggests that BMP use may be favored in ASD surgery; however, this determination requires further research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available