4.3 Article

A prospective study of measured body size and height and risk of keratinocyte cancers and melanoma

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 119-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.006

Keywords

BMI; BSA; Height; Skin cancer; Melanoma; Longitudinal study; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [552429]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The potential influence of measured body weight and height on keratinocyte skin cancer risk has scarcely been studied. Some evidence indicates melanoma risk increases as self-reported height increases, but an association with body mass index (BMI) is less certain. Methods: We measured body weight and height of 1171 Australian men and women in a communitybased skin cancer study in Queensland and prospectively examined the association of BMI, body surface area (BSA) and height and incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma while accounting for skin phenotype, sun exposure, clinical/cutaneous signs of chronic photodamage and other risk factors. Results: During 16 years of follow-up, 334 and 188 participants newly developed BCC and SCC, respectively; 28 participants were diagnosed with primary melanoma. BMI and BSA were unrelated to skin cancer incidence. After full adjustment, height was significantly associated with SCC development in men (relative risk (RR) = 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-2.48, for >= 175 cm vs >= 171 cm, P-trend = 0.017), and BCC in women (P-trend = 0.043). Melanoma in men, was similarly positively associated with height (RR per 5 cm increment = 1.55; 95% CI 0.97-2.47, P = 0.067) though not significantly. Conclusion: This study shows that after adjusting for sun exposure tall stature may be a risk factor for the most common types of skin cancer BCC, SCC, and melanoma, while body mass and surface area appear unrelated to risk. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available