4.6 Article

Cryptanalysis and improvement of medical image encryption using high-speed scrambling and pixel adaptive diffusion

Journal

SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107286

Keywords

Chaotic cryptography; Cryptanalysis; Chosen plain image attack

Funding

  1. Foundation of National Natural Science of China [61772147]
  2. Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation of Major Basic Research and Cultivation Project [2015A030308016]
  3. Project of Ordinary University Innovation Team Construction of Guangdong Province [2015KCXTD014]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Major Projects of Bureau of Education of Guangzhou City [1201610005]
  5. National Cryptography Development Fund [MMJJ20170117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A medical image encryption algorithm using high-speed scrambling and pixel adaptive diffusion was recently proposed by Hua et al. The algorithm mainly consists of random data insertion, high-speed scrambling, and pixel adaptive diffusion. Before performing the scrambling-diffusion process, external random pixels are inserted into the surrounding plain image. Then, high-speed scrambling and pixel adaptive diffusion are respectively used to randomly shuffle adjacent pixels and spread them throughout the cipher image. The authors claim that this scheme can achieve both high efficiency and strong robustness. However, under bad randomness, we have found that the cipher image can be completely recovered by using a chosen plain image attack. To increase resistance against such attacks, we propose an improved encryption scheme that performs nonlinear operations on permuted images using an enhanced version of the original algorithm. Experimental results and security analysis show that our improved encryption algorithm can not only resist chosen plain image attacks but also maintain the merits of the original algorithm. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available