4.7 Article

Green preparation process using methyl lactate for cellulose-acetate-based nanofiltration membranes

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 232, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115903

Keywords

Green solvents; Methyl lactate; Cellulose acetate; Nanofiltration; Phase inversion

Funding

  1. KU Leuven [C16/17/005]
  2. Belgian Federal Government through an I.A.P. - P.A.I. grant [LAP 7/05 FS2]
  3. Flemish government
  4. European Commission - Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) under Erasmus Mundus Doctorate in Membrane Engineering (EUDIME) program
  5. KU Leuven Internal Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulose acetate (CA) membranes were prepared via phase inversion using methyl lactate as a green solvent and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran as a green co-solvent with or without evaporation period prior to immersion of the cast polymer solution in the coagulation bath. The membrane morphologies were characterized using scanning electron microscopy and the membrane performance was screened using aqueous rose bengal (RB) or MgSO4 feed solutions. With CA-concentration in the casting solution increasing from 8 to 20 wt%, RB-rejection increased from 31.1% to 99.5%, while permeance decreased from 32.0 to 2.4 L/m(2).h.bar. CA-membranes cast from a 10 wt% polymer solution had a RB-rejection higher than 92.0% with good permeance around 3.5 L/m(2).h.bar at low co-solvent concentration (10 wt%). However, with increased co-solvent concentration (i.e. 30-50 wt%), both rejection and permeance surprisingly decreased, regardless evaporation time. For membranes cast from a 20 wt% polymer solution, RB-rejection remained around 99% and permeance decreased with increasing co-solvent concentration in the casting solution. MgSO4 rejection was around 93.0% for membranes cast from a 20 wt% polymer solution with 10 wt% co -solvent without evaporation (at a flux of 1.0 L/m(2).h.bar) and 96.5% with evaporation at a flux of 1.3 L/m(2).h.bar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available