4.7 Article

M-Nx (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) doped graphitic nanocages with High specific surface Area for non-enzymatic electrochemical detection of H2O2

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127550

Keywords

Biosensor; Template-approach; High specific surface area; Efficient catalysis; Floating catalytic pyrolysis

Funding

  1. science and technology commission of Shanghai municipality [13PJ1407400, 14520503100, 15520503400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21306113]
  3. Shanghai institute of technology [ZQ2018-14, XTCX2017-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-doped porous-walled graphitic nanocages (NGCs) with high specific surface area have been successfully doped by metallic ions (M2+ = Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+ or Cu2+) for efficiently detecting H2O2. To increase surface area, NGCs were prepared by partially removing N-doped template inserted in their graphitic layers to sharply create nanopores in graphitic shells of nanocages, which were approached from removing ferrous cores of core-shell precursor (Fe3C@NDC) synthesized from short-time floating catalytic pyrolysis. With high specific surface area (920 m(2)g(-1)), mesopore volume (1.6 cm(3) g(-1)) and good graphitization, the synergistic effects of metallic ions and N-doped structure, which improves their dispersion and increases active sites, plays a very important role in detection of H2O2. Fe-N coordination much easier forms in the condition of our experiment than Co-N, Ni-N and Cu-N, which might lead to better electrochemical performance of Fe-Nx doped graphitic nanocages (Fe-NGCs), including wider linear range (0.001-5 mM), lower LOD (0.53 mu M), higher sensitivity (184.4 mu AmM-1 cm(-2)), selectivity and stability. Such results demonstrate Fe-NGCs nanocomposite is a promising candidate for the detection of H2O2 in practical application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available