4.6 Article

1-Point RANSAC UKF with Inverse Covariance Intersection for Fault Tolerance

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20020353

Keywords

fault tolerance; inverse covariance intersection; 1-point RANSAC UKF; robust estimation filtering

Funding

  1. MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) [IITP-2019-2018-0-01423]
  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) of the Korean government
  3. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA)
  4. Institute for Information & Communication Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP), Republic of Korea [2018-0-01423-003] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [153340] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fault tolerance estimation method is proposed to maintain reliable correspondences between sensor data and estimation performance regardless of the number of valid measurements. The proposed method is based on the 1-point random sample consensus (RANSAC) unscented Kalman filter (UKF), and the inverse covariance intersection (ICI)-based data fusion method is added to the update process in the proposed algorithm. To verify the performance of the proposed algorithm, two analyses are performed with respect to the degree of measurement error reduction and accuracy of generated information. In addition, experiments are conducted using the dead reckoning (DR)/global positioning system (GPS) navigation system with a barometric altimeter to confirm the performance of fault tolerance in the altitude. It is confirmed that the proposed algorithm maintains estimation performance when there are not enough valid measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available