4.6 Article

Enhanced Performance of Reagent-Less Carbon Nanodots Based Enzyme Electrochemical Biosensors

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19245576

Keywords

carbon nanodots; nanomaterials; oxidoreductase-based biosensors; L-lactate biosensor; electrochemical techniques; lactate oxidase; glucose oxidase; uricase

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad [CTQ2017-84309-C2-1-R]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [RED2018-102412-T]
  3. Comunidad de Madrid [S2018/NMT-4349]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reports on the advantages of using carbon nanodots (CNDs) in the development of reagent-less oxidoreductase-based biosensors. Biosensor responses are based on the detection of H2O2, generated in the enzymatic reaction, at 0.4 V. A simple and fast method, consisting of direct adsorption of the bioconjugate, formed by mixing lactate oxidase, glucose oxidase, or uricase with CNDs, is employed to develop the nanostructured biosensors. Peripherical amide groups enriched CNDs are prepared from ethyleneglycol bis-(2-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, and used as precursors. The bioconjugate formed between lactate oxidase and CNDs was chosen as a case study to determine the analytical parameters of the resulting L-lactate biosensor. A linear concentration range of 3.0 to 500 mu M, a sensitivity of 4.98 x 10(-3) mu A.mu M-1, and a detection limit of 0.9 mu M were obtained for the L-lactate biosensing platform. The reproducibility of the biosensor was found to be 8.6%. The biosensor was applied to the L-lactate quantification in a commercial human serum sample. The standard addition method was employed. L-lactate concentration in the serum extract of 0.9 +/- 0.3 mM (n = 3) was calculated. The result agrees well with the one obtained in 0.9 +/- 0.2 mM, using a commercial spectrophotometric enzymatic kit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available