4.7 Article

Carotenoid composition and expression of carotenogenic genes in the peel and pulp of commercial mango fruit cultivars

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109072

Keywords

Mango; Carotenoids; Commercial maturity; Gene expression; Ripening

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371866]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201804010417]
  3. Young innovative talents Program of the Guangdong Higher Education Institutions [2o18GkQNCX008]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College [2018ZR022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fruits of two mango cultivars ('Tainong' and 'Jinhuang') with commercial maturity were analyzed for their firmness, TSS (Total soluble solids), color index and soluble sugar content. Compared to Vinhuang', 'Tainong' was texture soften and had higher soluble sugar content and the color judged visually the maturity. To study the regulation mechanism of carotenoid metabolism, carotenoid component and the expression levels of 12 carotenogenic genes in peel and pulp of two mango fruit cultivars with commercial maturity were analsyed. Total carotenoid content in the peel and pulp of 'Tainong' was 116.78 ug/g FW and 77.48 ug/g FW, which were 1.39 times and 1.63 times in the peel and pulp of 'Jinhuang', respectively. Among the carotenoid components, the main carotenoids in the peel and pulp were alpha-carotene and beta-Carotene, and a small number of carotenoids were lycopene, beta-cryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin and lutein. qRT-PCR analysis showed that the accumulation of carotenoids in the peel and pulp of different mango cultivars was controlled by the differential expression of carotenogenic genes. Our results provide new clues for the molecular mechanism of carotenoids metabolism in postharvest ripening of different mango cultivars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available