4.7 Article

Using forced regrowth to manipulate Chardonnay grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) development to evaluate phenological stage responses to temperature

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109065

Keywords

Chardonnay grape; Degree-day methods; Phenology; Physiological factors; Radiation use efficiency; Upper temperature

Categories

Funding

  1. Spain's National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA) [RTA 2012-00059-C02-01]
  2. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Time and environmental conditions, such as temperature and photoperiod, are the main drivers governing grapevine development over the growing season. The most obvious growth periods in grapevines are budbreak, bloom, veraison and berry maturity. The aims of this study were to evaluate the environmental and physiological factors influencing the phenological development of Chardonnay grapevines, and to determine the best fit parameters of degree-day calculation methods for the prediction of various phenological stages. Phenological data retrieved from field vines and vines forced to regrow after heavy pruning and defoliation, whose developmental onset conditions were modified, were used to test and parameterize the degree-day calculation methods. An upper temperature threshold (T-U) was optimized for the different developmental stages, and measures of the radiation use efficiency were derived to adjust T-U during berry maturity. According with the candidate methods, the highest T-U value coincided with bloom (29.8 degrees C), while the lowest was observed at veraison (20.9 degrees C), The RMSE of the model predictions for specific developmental stages ranged from 2 (fruit set) to 9 days (berry maturity). Modifying vine growth periods by forcing vine regrowth allowed evaluation of temperature and physiological factors that influence grapevine development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available